Powered by Blogger.
RSS

AMERICAN PRAGMATISM


Novel:
A Case Study

Arthur Conan Doyle’s



SUMMARY:
Set in 1887, the story revolves around the case of Miss Mary Sutherland, a woman with a substantial income from the interest on a fund set up for her. She is engaged to a quiet Londoner who has recently disappeared. Sherlock Holmes's detective powers are barely challenged as this turns out to be quite an elementary case for him, much as it puzzles Watson.
The fiancé, Mr. Hosmer Angel, is a peculiar character, rather quiet, and rather secretive about his life. Miss Sutherland only knows that he works in an office in Leadenhall Street, but nothing more specific than that. All his letters to her are typewritten, even the signature, and he insists that she write back to him through the local Post Office.
The climax of the sad liaison comes when Mr. Angel abandons Miss Sutherland at the altar on their wedding day.
Holmes, noting all these things, Hosmer Angel's description, and the fact that he only seems to meet with Miss Sutherland while her disapproving youngish stepfather, James Windibank, is out of the country on business, reaches a conclusion quite quickly. A typewritten letter confirms his belief beyond doubt. Only one person could have gained by this: Mr. James Windibank. Holmes deduces "Angel" had "disappeared" by simply going out the other side of a four-wheeler cab.
After solving the mystery, Holmes chooses not to tell his client the solution, since "If I tell her she will not believe me. You may remember the old Persian saying, 'There is danger for him who taketh the tiger cub, and danger also for whoso snatches a delusion from a woman.' There is as much sense in Hafiz as in Horace, and as much knowledge of the world." In this, however, he can be accused of not fulfilling his professional duty for which he was paid – namely, to investigate the matter to which she set him, provide her with the results and let her decide what to do with them. Holmes does advise his client to forget "Mr. Angel"; Miss Sutherland refuses to take Holmes' advice and vows to remain faithful to "Angel" until he reappears – for at least ten years.
Holmes predicts Windibank will continue a career in crime and end up on the gallows.


CRITICISM:

Pragmatism is all about collaboration of science and technology and in the story the case of identity they use both science and technology to solve the mystery.“A Case of Identity” is the third story in Doyle’s anthology Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.  It uses a simple formula for a mystery that still instills a thrill among readers to seek a solution to the case.  The story is introduced, as many of the Holmes’ stories begin, with a discourse between Holmes and Watson. A debate between Watson and Holmes on whether real life can be considered eccentric or dull in comparison to the written tales of authors serves as an introduction to the mystery.  Holmes takes the former view of life while Watson believes the latter.  Holmes believes that the case presented by the client whom he is expecting would convince Watson of life’s eccentricities. The client, a nearsighted woman, is seeking Holmes talents to locate her missing fiancĂ©e.  The clues are brought forward at this point, including the missing person’s appearance, the missing person’s typewritten signature, and the client’s remarkable inheritance.  An alert reader can use these clues to draw up answers to the questions who, how, and why respectively.   With this evidence brought forth, a conclusion can be drawn up by the reader.  This is necessary in any mystery as the continual piecing together of clues and the asking of questions by the readers keeps them engaged in the story.  The literary element that also adds to the light-hearted yet intellectual tone of this Sherlock Holmes story is that, according to Holmes and Watson’s perspective, the existence of the case affirms Holmes theory that reality is more unusual than fiction.  However, as a reader, we can be amused by the story as such cases of false identity do not occur often in reality, thus favoring Watson’s theory in comparing the eccentricities of literature and reality.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS